Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.23 seconds)
Trilochan Singh Johar And Anr. vs State And Anr. on 24 April, 2002 cites

State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners further argues that power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. are not governed by any other provision of the Code, therefore, in the peculiar circumstances the petitioners are entitled to the relief of cancellation of the above FIR and the proceedings thereon without even impleading the accused as respondent. I am unable to agree. Law with regard to powers of the court for quashing the FIR and the proceedings thereto is well-settled by the Supreme Court in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, and several subsequent judgments. At this stage, on the basis of un-controverter allegations made in the FIR and the evidence collected by the prosecution in support of its case, it cannot be said that the accused had not committed any offence. As per the petitioners' own showing, the matter is listed for the prosecution evidence. Thus, no case for quashing the FIR is made out.
Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 19733 - S R Pandian - Full Document
1   2 Next