Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.29 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 6 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Ramniklal N. Bhutta & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 19 November, 1996
14. Before adverting to the rival submissions of the learned counsel for
the parties this court deems it appropriate to refer few decisions of the
Hon‟ble Apex Court being relevant and germane hereto. It is settled law that
the wherever there is conflict between the private interest and the larger
public interest, the later prevails over the former. The private interest must
give way to the public interest and the same should stand subordinate to
public good. The Apex Court in "Ramniklal N. Bhutta and another Vs.
State of Maharashtra and others" reported in AIR 1997 SC 1236at para
10 has noticed as follows:-
Pratibha Nema & Ors vs State Of M.P. & Ors on 30 July, 2003
15. The Apex Court in "Pratibha Nema Vs. State of MP reported in
AIR 2003 SC 3140", has noticed as under: -
State Of U.P. And Anr vs Johri Mal on 21 April, 2004
21. Lastly it goes without saying that the consistent view of the
constitutional courts in the matters of land acquisitions has been that the
viability or feasibility in the process of acquisition does not fall with the
domain of courts unless it exfacie is found to be contrary to law or is tainted
with palpable malafides. Reference in this regard to the judgement of the
Apex court titled as "State of UP and Ors Vs. Johri Mal reported in
(2004) 4 SCC 714 would be advantageous wherein following has been
observed:
Union Of India vs Kushala Shetty & Ors on 21 February, 2011
16. The Hon‟ble Apex Court in a case titled as Union of India v. Dr.
Kushala Shetty & others reported in (2011)12 SCC 69, while adjudicating
upon the validity of the acquisition proceedings carried on by NHAI for the
widening of national highway observed as follows: