Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.26 seconds)Section 188 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 354C in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 268 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 287 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 336 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 441 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sau. Kamal Shivaji Pokarnekar vs The State Of Maharashtra on 12 February, 2019
6. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India passed in the
judgment reported in 2019 (14) SCC 350 in the case of Sau. Kamal
Shivaji Pokarnekar vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors.,
(Crl.A.No.255 of 2019 dated 12.02.2019 ) held that the learned
Page 3 of 8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 15/05/2025 02:22:48 pm )
Crl.O.P.Nos.6471, 6475 & 6478 of 2025
Magistrate while taking cognizance and summoning, is required to apply
his judicial mind only with the view to taking cognizance of the offence
whether a prima facie case has been made out for summoning the
accused person. The learned Magistrate is not required to evaluate the
merits of the materials or evidence in support of the complaint, because
the Magistrate must not undertake the exercise to find out whether the
materials would lead to conviction or not. Only in a case where the
complaint does not disclose any offence or is frivolous, vexatious or
oppressive, the complaint/FIR can be taken for consideration for
quashment. If the allegations set out in the complaint do not constitute
the offence of which cognizance has been taken by Magistrate, it can be
considered for quashment. Therefore, it is not necessary that a meticulous
analysis of the case should be done before the trial to find out whether
the case would end in conviction or acquittal. If it appears on a reading
of the complaint and consideration of the allegations therein, in the light
of the statement made on oath that the ingredients of the offence are
disclosed, there would be no justification to interfere. At the initial stage
of issuance of process, it is no open to the Court to stifle the proceedings
by entering into the merits of the contentions made on behalf of the
accused. Therefore, the criminal complaint cannot be quashed only on
Page 4 of 8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 15/05/2025 02:22:48 pm )
Crl.O.P.Nos.6471, 6475 & 6478 of 2025
the ground that the allegations made therein appear to be of a civil
nature. If the ingredients of the offence alleged against the accused are
prima facie made out in the complaint, the criminal proceeding shall not
be interdicted.