Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (0.34 seconds)
Budhi Singh vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 3 July, 2023 cites

The State Of Gujarat vs Narayan @ Narayan Sai @ Mota Bhagwan ... on 20 October, 2021

33. The learned amicus further relied on the judgement passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Gujarat v. Narayan a Narayan Sai @ MotaBhagwanAsaram: 2021 SCC OnLine SC 949; wherein a convict who was convicted under Section 376 IPC applied for furlough, and the same was rejected by the DG Prisons., which was later overturned by the Hon'ble High Court. While setting aside the order of the High Court (which granted furlough to the convict), the Hon'ble Apex Court held that a prisoner does not have an absolute legal right to claim furlough. The grant of furlough must be balanced against the public interest and can be refused to certain categories of prisoners.
Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 15 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

State Of Haryana & Others vs Mohinder Singh on 7 February, 2000

23. They had also relied upon the judgments passed in Bhupinder Singh v. Unitech Ltd.: 2021 SCC OnLine SC 320; Rajendra Diwan v. Pradeep Kumar Ranibala & Anr.: (2019) 20 SCC 143; State of Maharashtra v. Suresh Pandurang Darvakar: (2006) 4 SCC 776; State of Haryana v. Mohinder Singh: (2000) 3 SCC 394 and Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar v. State of Maharashtra: (1966) 3 SCR 711; in support of their contentions that the text is the best test of legislative intent unless, it is ambiguous. When the language of the provision is plain and unambiguous, it is not open for the Court to read into it, any limitations based on some probable intention of the legislature. Such intention has to be gathered only from words actually used in the statute.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 155 - D P Wadhwa - Full Document

State Of Maharashtra & Anr vs Suresh Pandurang Darvakar on 13 April, 2006

23. They had also relied upon the judgments passed in Bhupinder Singh v. Unitech Ltd.: 2021 SCC OnLine SC 320; Rajendra Diwan v. Pradeep Kumar Ranibala & Anr.: (2019) 20 SCC 143; State of Maharashtra v. Suresh Pandurang Darvakar: (2006) 4 SCC 776; State of Haryana v. Mohinder Singh: (2000) 3 SCC 394 and Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar v. State of Maharashtra: (1966) 3 SCR 711; in support of their contentions that the text is the best test of legislative intent unless, it is ambiguous. When the language of the provision is plain and unambiguous, it is not open for the Court to read into it, any limitations based on some probable intention of the legislature. Such intention has to be gathered only from words actually used in the statute.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 51 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Bhupinder Singh vs Unitech Ltd. on 23 March, 2023

32. The learned Amicus contended that once an appeal/ special leave petition is preferred by a convict before the Hon'ble Apex Court, judicial discipline would require all other Courts / authorities to refrain from exercising powers with respect to the subject matter pending before the Hon'ble Apex Court. He relied on the judgement passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Bhupinder Singh v. Unitech Ltd.: 2021 SCC Online SC 320; where the Accused persons, after denial of bail by the Hon'ble Apex Court, approached the High Court, which granted liberty to the Accused to approach the Magistrate. Upon grant of such liberty, the Accused persons applied for Bail before the Magistrate, Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARMINDER KAUR Signing Date:03.07.2023 18:49:13 W.P.(Crl) 697 of 2022 Page 14 of 32 which directed that they be released. It was held that when an appeal / special leave petition is pending before the Hon'ble Apex Court, only that Court would be empowered to consider the prayer of bail, on account of the principle of judicial discipline.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 6 - M R Shah - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next