Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (2.24 seconds)
Deepak Harikisan Agrawal And Another vs The State Of Maharashtra Through ... on 5 August, 2022
cites
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 19 in The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Section 127 in The Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Satish Soma Bhole And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 23 March, 2016
Judgment
wp3706.20 1
14
the MRTP Act. The only objections raised by the respondents is that
the notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act was issued by earlier
owners i.e. Shivchand Madanlal Agrawal and Ginnibai Vishvanath
Agrawal and not by the petitioner No.2. As to another objection
raised that the petitioner No.2 could not claim de-reservation on the
basis of the said notice for which he was not party, learned counsel
for the petitioners has rightly relied on a reported judgment of this
court in the case of Satish Soma Bhole vs. State of Maharashtra and
others reported cited supra. This Court had held that the notice
issued by the predecessor-in-title would not disentitle the purchaser
of the property to seek the benefit of the provisions of Section 127
of the MRTP Act. It is held in the judgment that once the notice is
issued under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, the time would not stop
running by the sale of the property by the owner.
Section 19 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Chhabildas vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... on 6 February, 2018
10. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Chhabildas Vs.
State of Maharashtra and ors. (2018) 2 SCC 784 in paragraph No.7
observed thus :
Section 157 in The Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 [Entire Act]
1