Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.20 seconds)Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 251 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Rangappa vs Sri Mohan on 7 May, 2010
17. As for as proof of existence of legally enforceable debt is
concerned, it is profitable to refer the decision of larger bench of
the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in Rangappa Vs. Mohan
reported in AIR 2010 SC 1898 = 2010 AIR (SCW) 2946,
Wherein their lordships pleased to observe that,
"In the light of these extracts, we are in
agreement with the respondent-claimant that the
presumption mandated by section 139 of the Act
does indeed include the existence of the legally
enforceable debt or liability".
Section 141 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
M/S. Shankar Finance & Investments vs State Of A.P. & Ors on 26 June, 2008
12. Per contra, complainant relied on the decision of Hon'ble
Supreme Court of India in, 2008 (4) KCCR, between Shankar
Finance and Investments Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and
ors, wherein it is held that;
Ranjitha Balasubramanian And Anr. vs Shanthi Group And Ors. on 12 December, 2006
In support of this
contention, accused relied on the decision reported in , KCCR
2007 (2) 1103 between Ranjitha Balasubramanian Vs.
Shanthi Group, wherein it is held that;
1