Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.27 seconds)Consumer Protection Act, 2019
Section 22 in Consumer Protection Act, 2019 [Entire Act]
The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987
The Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Section 20 in Consumer Protection Act, 2019 [Entire Act]
The Repealing and Amending Act, 2015
M/S Interglobe Aviation Ltd vs N.Satchidanand on 4 July, 2011
8. Learned counsel has further submitted that as per the
terms and conditions mentioned above, the appellant/complainant
was not entitled for the disability benefit and also in accordance with
the settled preposition of law. Learned counsel has relied upon
judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case titled as
"InterGlobe Aviation Ltd. Vs N.Satchidanand", Civil Appeal
No.4925 of 2011, decided on 04.07.20211 and judgment of Hon'ble
National Commission in case titled as "Muzamil Mattoo and Anr.
Vs. Emaar MGF Land Limited", Consumer Case No.2567 of 2018,
decided on 14.02.2022, reported in II (2022) CPJ 33 (NC).
Muzamil Mattoo & Anr. vs Emaar Mgf Land Limited on 14 February, 2022
8. Learned counsel has further submitted that as per the
terms and conditions mentioned above, the appellant/complainant
was not entitled for the disability benefit and also in accordance with
the settled preposition of law. Learned counsel has relied upon
judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case titled as
"InterGlobe Aviation Ltd. Vs N.Satchidanand", Civil Appeal
No.4925 of 2011, decided on 04.07.20211 and judgment of Hon'ble
National Commission in case titled as "Muzamil Mattoo and Anr.
Vs. Emaar MGF Land Limited", Consumer Case No.2567 of 2018,
decided on 14.02.2022, reported in II (2022) CPJ 33 (NC).
Estate Officer vs Colonel H.V. Mankotia (Retired) on 7 October, 2021
Learned counsel has also relied upon other
judgment of case titled as "State Officer Vs. Colonel H.V.
Mankotia" reported as AIR 2021 SC 4894, wherein it has been
held that once no Compromise or Settlement had been arrived
between the parties before the Lok Adalat, the matter has to be
returned to be decided by the concerned court. Furthermore, the
learned counsel has contended that Permanent Lok Adalat had
already lost its existence on account of coming into operation of
Central Act No.17 of 2015, namely Repealing and Amending Act,
2015, because of Repeal of Act No.37 of 2022, the Permanent Lok
Adalat denuded of its powers once enjoined upon it under Chapter
VI-A of 1987 Act. Therefore, the order dated 01.03.2021 passed by
Lok Adalat was wholly without jurisdiction and null and void.
1