Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.20 seconds)
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs Tulsabai on 31 March, 2026 cites

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

15. Miscellaneous Appeal Nos.6741/2019; 6783/2019; and 6829/2019 have been preferred by appellant / claimant / injured, wherein learned Claims Tribunal has grossly failed to award any amount in the head of loss of permanent disability, therefore, keeping in view the guidelines laid down by the Apex court with regard to income; future prospects and application of multiplier in the case of Smt. Sarla Verma (Supra) and Pranay Sethi (Supra), after adding the amount towards permanent disability, just and proper compensation comes as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Amrit Paul Singh vs Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd. on 17 May, 2018

- 12 - MA-5054-2019 4.1 His contention is that as there was a breach of Rule 85, learned Claims Tribunal should have exonerated the Insurance Company. For this he has placed reliance on para 23 of the judgment delivered by the Apex Court in the case of Amrit Paul Singh and Ors. Vs. TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors. reported in 2018 ACJ 1768; para 12 of National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Challa Bharathamma and Others reported in 2004 ACJ 2094; and para 18 of the judgment by Kerala High Court in the case of Pareed Pillai Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. reported in 2019 ACJ 16.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 496 - D Misra - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Chella Bharathamma & Ors on 21 September, 2004

- 12 - MA-5054-2019 4.1 His contention is that as there was a breach of Rule 85, learned Claims Tribunal should have exonerated the Insurance Company. For this he has placed reliance on para 23 of the judgment delivered by the Apex Court in the case of Amrit Paul Singh and Ors. Vs. TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors. reported in 2018 ACJ 1768; para 12 of National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Challa Bharathamma and Others reported in 2004 ACJ 2094; and para 18 of the judgment by Kerala High Court in the case of Pareed Pillai Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. reported in 2019 ACJ 16.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 623 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Pareed Pillai vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd on 9 October, 2018

- 12 - MA-5054-2019 4.1 His contention is that as there was a breach of Rule 85, learned Claims Tribunal should have exonerated the Insurance Company. For this he has placed reliance on para 23 of the judgment delivered by the Apex Court in the case of Amrit Paul Singh and Ors. Vs. TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors. reported in 2018 ACJ 1768; para 12 of National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Challa Bharathamma and Others reported in 2004 ACJ 2094; and para 18 of the judgment by Kerala High Court in the case of Pareed Pillai Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. reported in 2019 ACJ 16.
Kerala High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 80 - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017

15. Miscellaneous Appeal Nos.6741/2019; 6783/2019; and 6829/2019 have been preferred by appellant / claimant / injured, wherein learned Claims Tribunal has grossly failed to award any amount in the head of loss of permanent disability, therefore, keeping in view the guidelines laid down by the Apex court with regard to income; future prospects and application of multiplier in the case of Smt. Sarla Verma (Supra) and Pranay Sethi (Supra), after adding the amount towards permanent disability, just and proper compensation comes as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 9815 - D Misra - Full Document

Chandra @ Chnada @ Chandraram vs Mukesh Kumar Yadav on 1 October, 2021

12. It is well settled that if the income has not been proved on the basis of evidence then it should be taken on the basis of circular issued under the Minimum Wages Act by the Labour Department prevailing on the date of accident. Same view has been taken by the Apex Court in the case of Chandra Vs. Mukesh Kumar Yadav reported in (2022) 1 SCC 198 : 2021 SCC OnLine SC 3093, which is reproduced hereinbelow:
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 58 - R S Reddy - Full Document
1