cites: 196468514

Vicky Promoters & Developers Pvt Ltd. & ... vs The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors on 5 February, 2020

Announced in open Court Digitally signed RINKU by RINKU JAIN On this 25th Day of July, 2025 JAIN Date: 2025.07.25 16:13:13 +0530 (RINKU JAIN) JSCC/ASCJ/GJ-01 (CENTRAL) TIS HAZARI COURTS/DELHI CS SCJ NO. 2409/2023 VICKY AND ANR. VS. MCD AND ORS. PAGE NO. 17 OF 17

Calcutta High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - R K Kapur - Full Document

Section 108 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 1561

Section 34 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 3964

Section 477 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]

NCT Delhi - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 1435

Section 478 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]

NCT Delhi - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 1679

Section 42 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 1337

The Specific Relief Act, 1963

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 10149

Section 107 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 961

Veruareddi Ramaraghava Reddy And Ors vs Konduru Seshu Reddy And 2 Ors on 26 April, 1966

This view must be held to have been rejected by this Court when it declared in Veruareddi Rmaranghava Reddy & Ors. v. Konduru Seshu Reddy & ors (1) (at p. 277) "In our opinion, S. 42 of the Specific Relief Act is not exhaustive of the cases in which a declaratory decree may be made and the courts have power to grant such a decree independently of the requirements of the section It follows, therefore, in the present case that the suit of the plaintiff for a declaration that the compromise decree is not CS SCJ NO. 2409/2023 VICKY AND ANR. VS. MCD AND ORS. PAGE NO. 9 OF 17 binding on the deity is maintainable as falling outside the purview of S.. 42 of the Specific Relief Act".

Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 79 - V Ramaswami - Full Document

Smt. Narbada And Anr. vs Ram Dayal on 22 February, 1967

18. Accordingly, plaintiffs have been successful in proving the issue No.1 in their favour and they are held entitled to a declaration that Sh. Billu Michal @ Noel be declared as presumed dead. The declaration of civil death of Sh. Billu Michal @ Noel shall be effective from the date of filing of the suit in the light of judgment of Narbada v. Ram Dayal (supra).

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 7 - Cited by 103 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results