Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.50 seconds)
Sh. Bimal Kumar vs M/S Shree Hari Vrinda City Pvt, Ltd on 5 June, 2023 cites

Bimla Aggarwal vs M/S Gupta International & Ors on 2 November, 2016

At that time, I gave the cheque in question to Jaiveer. Jaiveer told that when he will get his cheque book issued, he will issue cheque in favour of complainant and his cheque will be returned back to him. Jaiveer further stated that the agreement is between the complainant and me. I do not owe any liability towards the complainant. It is possible CC NO. 48931/2018 Sh. Bimla Kumar Vs. M/S shre Hari Vrinda City Pvt. Ltd. 5/26 6 that there might be some more cheques in the possession of complainant and Jaiveer has expired. Jaiveer used to get the amount transferred in different bank accounts including KVC builders Chandigarh from my account. Jaiveer alongwith one more accomplice misbehaved with me and threatened me. I have also made complaint with regard to same at PS Sector 17 Dwarka. "
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 3 - J Nath - Full Document

Sampelly Satyanarayan Rao vs Indian Renewable Energy Development ... on 19 September, 2016

29. Reliance can asso be placed on judgment Sampelly Satyanaraya Rao Vs Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Ltd, 2016 SCC on line SC 954 AIR 2016 SC 4363 : 2016 CC NO. 48931/2018 Sh. Bimla Kumar Vs. M/S shre Hari Vrinda City Pvt. Ltd. 19/26 20 (9) SCAE 11: 2016 (10) SCC 458 wherein interpretting the word "security" it was observed that "The said expression refers to other cheques being towards repayment of installments. The repayment becomes due under the agreement, the moment the loan is advanced and the installment falls due. Once the loan was disbursed and installments have fallen due on the date of the cheque as per the agreement, dishonour of such cheques would fall under section 138 of the Act."
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 492 - A K Goel - Full Document
1   2 Next