Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (1.24 seconds)Section 11 in The Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
The Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958
Section 12 in The Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Cadbury India Limited vs Sm Dyechem Limited on 24 August, 1999
"Para 18 - We are unable to agree with the aforesaid observations in Dyechem's case (supra). As far as this Court is concerned, the decisions in the last four decades have clearly laid down that what has to be seen in the case of a passing off action is the similarity between the competing marks and to determine whether there is likelihood of deception or causing confusion.
M/S S.M. Dyechem Ltd vs M/S Cadbury (India) Ltd on 9 May, 2000
5.11 As regards earlier judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of S.M. Dyechem Ltd. v. Cadbury (India) Ltd. (supra), a three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court has partly dissented from ratio of the said judgment in the case of Cadila Health Care Ltd. (supra). The Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed in paragraph Nos. 18,19,20 thus :-