Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.27 seconds)
Junaid Ayubi vs State Of Haryana on 24 May, 2022 cites

Pramod Kumar vs U.P.Sec.Education Services Com. & Ors on 7 March, 2008

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though application was only for sand mining, EC has been granted for boulder, gravel and sand. No replenishment study has been conducted as is mandatory in terms of The Enforcement & Monitoring Guidelines for Sand Mining (EMGSM-2020), under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and order of this Tribunal dated 11.03.2020 in Appeal No. 23/2021, Pramod v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors., holding as follows:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 148 - S B Sinha - Full Document

President, Gyan Aradhna Trust, Pali vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 9 March, 2009

5. Even before issuing notice, the Project Proponent (PP), R-5, has entered appearance through Counsel to oppose the Appeal. We have heard learned Counsel for the PP accordingly. He submitted that the PP has given an undertaking that no mining will be done for boulder and gravel and thus mining is only for sand. With regard to replenishment study, it is submitted that it is not required. Our attentions has been drawn to order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 11.11.2021 in I.A No. 29984 of 2021, Bajri Lease LoI Holders Welfare Society Through its President v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors., wherein referring to earlier judgement in Deepak Kumar v. State of Haryana1, it was observed:-
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 3 - Cited by 9 - D Verma - Full Document

Deepak Kumar Etc vs State Of Haryana & Ors.Etc on 27 February, 2012

5. Even before issuing notice, the Project Proponent (PP), R-5, has entered appearance through Counsel to oppose the Appeal. We have heard learned Counsel for the PP accordingly. He submitted that the PP has given an undertaking that no mining will be done for boulder and gravel and thus mining is only for sand. With regard to replenishment study, it is submitted that it is not required. Our attentions has been drawn to order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 11.11.2021 in I.A No. 29984 of 2021, Bajri Lease LoI Holders Welfare Society Through its President v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors., wherein referring to earlier judgement in Deepak Kumar v. State of Haryana1, it was observed:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 430 - Full Document
1