Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.66 seconds)
Manoj Kr Singh vs Bsnl on 20 March, 2025 cites

State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Brahma Datt Sharma And Anr on 25 February, 1987

." The respondents have mentione mentioned d that all such cases are still pending with the disciplinary authority. 5.3 It is further contended by the respondents that BSNL Corporate office dealing with casual labours' misconduct of forged documents in securing employment had deliberated with Vigilance Branch as well and conveyed vide letter dated 16.04.2018 that the case may be dealt as per para 3 of the terms and conditions of their appoin appointment tment order dated 20.09.2002 and the said letter was forwarded by Circle Office vide letter dated 26.04.2018 to concerned SSA heads for necessary action. But before any action is taken applicants approached this Tribunal and the Tribunal granted interim stay ay order on the letter dated 13.04.2018 and 16.04.2018 of BSNL Corporate office. Hence, the respondents have submitted that the matter may be treated as premature and prayed for dismissal of the OA. The learned counsel for respondents cited the judgments off Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of (i) State of UP Vs. Brahm Dutt Sharma and Another [ (1987) 2 SCC 179], (ii) Executive Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board Vs. Ramesh Kumar Singh & Others [(1996) 1 SCC 327], (iii) UOI Vs. Kunisetty Satyanarayan [ AIR(SC) IR(SC) 2007 906], (iv) Special Director and Another Vs. Mohd. GhulamGhouse and Another [ (2004) 3 SCC 5440] and order dated 01.09.2014 of Hon'ble Patna High Court dated in CWJC No. 18912 of 2011 and Ors. and order dated 16.04.2003 in the matter of The State te of Bihar &Ors. Vs. Md. Asif &Ors.and Amar Kumar Bhagat [2003(2) 2003(2) PLJR] in support of their case. The learned counsel for
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 967 - K N Singh - Full Document

The Executive Engineer,Bihar State ... vs Ramesh Kumar Singh & Ors on 22 November, 1995

." The respondents have mentione mentioned d that all such cases are still pending with the disciplinary authority. 5.3 It is further contended by the respondents that BSNL Corporate office dealing with casual labours' misconduct of forged documents in securing employment had deliberated with Vigilance Branch as well and conveyed vide letter dated 16.04.2018 that the case may be dealt as per para 3 of the terms and conditions of their appoin appointment tment order dated 20.09.2002 and the said letter was forwarded by Circle Office vide letter dated 26.04.2018 to concerned SSA heads for necessary action. But before any action is taken applicants approached this Tribunal and the Tribunal granted interim stay ay order on the letter dated 13.04.2018 and 16.04.2018 of BSNL Corporate office. Hence, the respondents have submitted that the matter may be treated as premature and prayed for dismissal of the OA. The learned counsel for respondents cited the judgments off Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of (i) State of UP Vs. Brahm Dutt Sharma and Another [ (1987) 2 SCC 179], (ii) Executive Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board Vs. Ramesh Kumar Singh & Others [(1996) 1 SCC 327], (iii) UOI Vs. Kunisetty Satyanarayan [ AIR(SC) IR(SC) 2007 906], (iv) Special Director and Another Vs. Mohd. GhulamGhouse and Another [ (2004) 3 SCC 5440] and order dated 01.09.2014 of Hon'ble Patna High Court dated in CWJC No. 18912 of 2011 and Ors. and order dated 16.04.2003 in the matter of The State te of Bihar &Ors. Vs. Md. Asif &Ors.and Amar Kumar Bhagat [2003(2) 2003(2) PLJR] in support of their case. The learned counsel for
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 658 - K S Paripoornan - Full Document

The State Of Bihar & Ors vs Dilip Kumar Bhagat & Ors on 28 November, 2018

." The respondents have mentione mentioned d that all such cases are still pending with the disciplinary authority. 5.3 It is further contended by the respondents that BSNL Corporate office dealing with casual labours' misconduct of forged documents in securing employment had deliberated with Vigilance Branch as well and conveyed vide letter dated 16.04.2018 that the case may be dealt as per para 3 of the terms and conditions of their appoin appointment tment order dated 20.09.2002 and the said letter was forwarded by Circle Office vide letter dated 26.04.2018 to concerned SSA heads for necessary action. But before any action is taken applicants approached this Tribunal and the Tribunal granted interim stay ay order on the letter dated 13.04.2018 and 16.04.2018 of BSNL Corporate office. Hence, the respondents have submitted that the matter may be treated as premature and prayed for dismissal of the OA. The learned counsel for respondents cited the judgments off Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of (i) State of UP Vs. Brahm Dutt Sharma and Another [ (1987) 2 SCC 179], (ii) Executive Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board Vs. Ramesh Kumar Singh & Others [(1996) 1 SCC 327], (iii) UOI Vs. Kunisetty Satyanarayan [ AIR(SC) IR(SC) 2007 906], (iv) Special Director and Another Vs. Mohd. GhulamGhouse and Another [ (2004) 3 SCC 5440] and order dated 01.09.2014 of Hon'ble Patna High Court dated in CWJC No. 18912 of 2011 and Ors. and order dated 16.04.2003 in the matter of The State te of Bihar &Ors. Vs. Md. Asif &Ors.and Amar Kumar Bhagat [2003(2) 2003(2) PLJR] in support of their case. The learned counsel for
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - M K Shah - Full Document

H.Guruswamy vs A. Krishnaiah Since Deceased By Lrs on 16 August, 2021

12. We have observed that the counsel for respondents is taking the plea that the Tribunal ribunal had granted them the liberty on 18.02.1999 that they shall, however, be at liberty to make necessary enquiry into the allegations regarding their engagement on the basis of alleged lleged forged records and to take appropriate action in the matter in accordance with law. Since no time frame was fixed so they are at liberty to conduct this enquiry even after twenty years. This is preposterous. Hon'ble ble Apex Court has observed in the latest judgment in Civil Appeal NO. 317 OF 2025 (Petition for Special Leave to Appeal(C) No. 9719/2020) in the matter of H. Guruswamy & ORS. Appellant(s) Vs. A. Krishnaiah since deceased by LRs Respondent(s) dated 08.01.2025 that ".........the rules of limitation ion are based on the principles of sound public policy and principles of equity. No court should keep the 'Sword of Damocles' hanging over the head of a litigant for an indefinite period of time."
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1