Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.29 seconds)Section 509 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 164 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 397 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 173 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Adalat Prasad vs Rooplal Jindal & Ors on 25 August, 2004
35. At last, this Court has also taken into consideration the petitioner's
arguments qua the impugned order dated 14th March, 2023 and is of the
considered view that the learned ASJ rightly passed the same by stating that
the Sessions Court does not have the power to recall/review its own order.
The same is in line with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
the case of Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal, (2004) 7 SCC 338 as per
which the CrPC does not provide for any review power or inherent power
with the subordinate criminal Courts and the remedy lies in invoking Section
482 of the CrPC (now Section 528 of the BNSS). Thus, it is held that there is
no illegality in the impugned order dated 14 th March, 2023 and the
petitioner's arguments thereto are rejected.