Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (3.46 seconds)
Rajeev Ranjan Kumar & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 13 April, 2018 cites

Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd vs Commercial Tax Officer And Ors on 22 November, 2004

In fact in the words of the Supreme Court as found in the judgment of the Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (supra) and Nihal Singh (supra), any direction by this Court in the circumstances discussed, either for continuation of the panel or for considering the cases of these petitioners for regularisation, in absence of facts supporting continuity of discharge, would amount to a direction for creation of post as well Patna High Court LPA No.535 of 2017 dt.17-04-2018 871/871 as financial liability which is neither in the domain nor within the framework of judicial review." (emphasis supplied)
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 402 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Liberty Oil Mills & Others vs Union Of India & Others on 1 May, 1984

In reference to the judgment rendered in the Liberty Oil Mills vs. Union of India reported in AIR 1984 SC 1271 it was held that the expression 'without assigning any reasons' implies that no decision has to be communicated and although the reasons for a decision taken may not be stated but the reasons must exist otherwise a decision becomes arbitrary. It has further been clarified that 'non-assigning of reasons' or 'non-communication thereof' may be based on public policy but a termination of appointment without existence of a cogent Patna High Court LPA No.535 of 2017 dt.17-04-2018 867/871 reason, would be arbitrary and against the public policy.
Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 570 - O C Reddy - Full Document
1