Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.73 seconds)Section 162 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 279 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Harjeet Singh @ Seeta vs State Of Punjab And Another on 6 December, 2001
2024.11.29
16:25:33
Harjeet Singh vs State 11 of 21
+0530
relevant. Thus, every omission is not a contradiction. It
becomes a contradiction provided it satisfies the test laid
down in the explanation under Section 162. Therefore,
when an omission becomes a contradiction, the procedure
provided in the proviso to sub-Section (1) of Section 162
must be followed for contradicting witnesses in the cross-
examination.