Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.25 seconds)Section 34 in The Punjab Land Revenue Rules [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 467 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Dr. Monica Kumar & Anr vs State Of U. P. & Ors on 27 May, 2008
In again another
subsequent Monica Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2008) 8 SCC
781, the Apex Court has propounded "Inherent jurisdiction under
Section 482 has to be exercised sparingly, carefully and with caution
and only when such exercise is justified by the tests specifically laid
down in the section itself."
Hamida vs Rashid @ Rasheed & Ors on 27 April, 2007
In another subsequent Hamida v. Rashid, (2008) 1
SCC 474, Hon'ble Apex Court propounded that "Ends of justice would
be better served if valuable time of the Court is spent in hearing those
appeals rather than entertaining petitions under Section 482 at an
interlocutory stage which after filed with some oblique motive in order
to circumvent the prescribed procedure, or to delay the trial which
enable to win over the witness or may disinterested in giving evidence,
ultimately resulting in miscarriage of Justice".