Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (1.59 seconds)

Smt.P.Veda Kumari And Others vs The Sub-Registrar, Banjara ... on 18 August, 2017

ix) The issue of cancellation of registered conveyance deeds was considered by this Court in Yanala Malleshwari v. Ananthula Sayamma2 and P. Veda Kumar v. The Sub-Registrar, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad3. This Court on consideration of facts and after discussing the relevant case laws refused to cancel the registered sale deeds therein. It was held that discretion under Article 226 must be exercised only in exceptional cases when alternative remedies are available. For cancellation of registered documents, the appropriate forum is the civil Court under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. It further held that where factual questions are involved the Court should refuse to grant relief under Article 226.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 42 - Cited by 6 - A R Rao - Full Document

Yanala Malleshwari And Ors. vs Ananthula Sayamma And Ors. on 24 October, 2006

ix) The issue of cancellation of registered conveyance deeds was considered by this Court in Yanala Malleshwari v. Ananthula Sayamma2 and P. Veda Kumar v. The Sub-Registrar, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad3. This Court on consideration of facts and after discussing the relevant case laws refused to cancel the registered sale deeds therein. It was held that discretion under Article 226 must be exercised only in exceptional cases when alternative remedies are available. For cancellation of registered documents, the appropriate forum is the civil Court under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. It further held that where factual questions are involved the Court should refuse to grant relief under Article 226.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 173 - Cited by 91 - Full Document
1