Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (1.36 seconds)

Subramanya vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 October, 2022

(o) Counsel has next argued that as per the joint recovery/arrest memo, the police had prior information that the appellant is in possession of the articles. However, the source was not disclosed and secondly, no separate inquest report was prepared for the recovery of the articles. These currency notes and the jewellery in terms of Section 27A of the Evidence Act, 1872 and in view of the decision in Subramanya Vs. State of Karnataka (supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 68 - Cited by 36 - U U Lalit - Full Document
1   2 3 Next