Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.19 seconds)
K. Ramabrahmam vs G. Narsingh Rao on 14 July, 2006 cites

Achal Reddi vs Ramakrishna Reddiar And Ors on 17 November, 1989

16. As regards the second question, it may be noted that once the appellant had based his claim on Ex. A-1, he can be said to have acquiesced in the title of the executant thereof, i.e., the mother of the respondent. Adverse possession is a concept, that emerges, when a person, not vested with the title, is in possession of the property, in derogation of the title of the rightful owner. If the possession is traceable to any permission or an act, emanating from the actual owner, it cannot be treated as adverse. To adopt the words of the Supreme Court in Achal Reddi v. Ramakrishna Reddiar AIR 1990 SC 553.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 92 - M F Beevi - Full Document
1