Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.65 seconds)

Satyadeo Prasad vs Smt. Chanderjoti Debi And Ors. on 26 February, 1965

16. At this juncture the facts stated by the principal plaintiff in the plaint and other documents by which she asserted her rights are very relevant and by virtue of Section 32 (7) of the Evidence Act the same could be considered to adjudicate the disputed questions involved in this appeal. Such view is fully fortified by the decision of by the Division Bench of Patna High Court in the matter of Satyadeo Prasad v. Smt. Chanderjoti Debi and Ors. in which it was held as under:
Patna High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Hans Raj (Dead) Through L.Rs. vs Karmi And Ors. on 27 August, 2003

23. So far execution of the sale deed on dated 22.11.1991 by Krishna Kumar-respondent No. 1 on the strength of power of attorney dated 19.11.1995 and the payment of its consideration are concerned, it is apparent from such sale deed that it's consideration was not paid in presence of Sub Registrar and the original power of attorney on which strength the sale deeds got executed is neither produced nor proved on record. I have not found any evidence that subsequent to it's registration it's consideration was paid to the principal plaintiff in any manner. In such circumstances, such transaction appears to be suspicious and malafide and the same is not sustainable. This question was answered by the High Court of Punjab and Hariyana in the matter of Hans Raj (deceased) and Ors. v. Karmi D/o Labhu and Ors. in which it was held as under:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 2 - V Mittal - Full Document
1   2 Next