Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (0.33 seconds)

Janki Narayan Bhoir vs Narayan Namdeo Kadam on 17 December, 2002

31. Ld. counsel for the accused/appellant contended that since the eye witness Tej Bahadur was not examined as he had died, his statement made to 10 PW-9 during investigation could not be used for corroboration in view of the section 162 Cr. P. C. It was further submitted that Ld. Trial Court erred in holding that as IO/PW-9 had proved the complaint Ex. PW9/A relying upon the decision of Janki Narayan Bhoir Vs Narender Namdev Kadam AIR 2003 SC 761.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 385 - S V Patil - Full Document
1   2 3 Next