Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.16 seconds)
Sachin Kumar vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others on 15 July, 2021 cites

Sudhir Kumar Mishra (Inre 7501 S/S 2005) vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secretary Revenue & 3 ... on 19 August, 2016

Considering the fact that the order impugned in the present writ petition does not consider the ''undue hardship" faced by the petitioner, the writ petition deserves to be allowed on that ground alone. Accordingly, the order dated 26.7.2017 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Establishment, Uttar pradesh Police Headquarters, Allahabad (respondent no. 4) is set aside and the matter is remanded back before the respondent no. 1 to take a fresh decision on the application in the light of the law laid down in the judgements as indicated above.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 7 - A P Sahi - Full Document

Antariksha vs State Of U.P. And Another on 5 June, 2020

He further relies upon the judgement of this Court in the case of Antarikasha Singh vs. State of U.P. and others, [2018 (Suppl.) ADJ 500] wherein this Court, after considering the scope of the word "undue hardship" as used in the Rule 5 of the Dying-in-Harness Rules, set aside the order of the State Government and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication in the light of directions given in the said judgement.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 3 - A Kumar - Full Document
1