Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)
Mali Ram vs M/O Mines on 21 December, 2023 cites

Shri Shekhar Ghosh vs Union Of India & Anr on 1 November, 2006

17. Learned counsels for the applicants have relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in the case of Shekhar Ghosh vs. Union of India & Anr., reported in (2007) 1 SCC 331. On perusing the same, we are of the opinion that the ratio decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in that case, does not apply to the present OAs as the facts were entirely different in the said case. The relevant paras of the said judgment read as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 93 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Ram Chandra Tripathi vs U.P. Public Services Tribunal Iv And ... on 25 February, 1994

"20. We are not oblivious that in Ram Chandra Tripathi vs. U.P. Public Services Tribunal IV, (1994) 5 SCC 180, an order passed by way of a mistake was permitted to be corrected as the same was done in violation of the order of injunction. In such a situation only, this Court held that an opportunity of being heard for correcting such mistake would not arise because there would not have been any occasion to take one view or the other in the matter on the basis of representation to be made by the affected employee.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 45 - G N Ray - Full Document

Union Of India & Others vs Bikash Kuanar on 11 October, 2006

22. Requirements to comply with the principles of natural justice would, therefore, vary from case to case. If upon giving an opportunity of hearing to an affected employee, it is possible to arrive at a different finding, the principles of natural justice must be complied with. We may notice that recently in Union of India v. Bikash Kuanar, (2006) 8 SCC 192, a Division of this Court opined: (SCC p. 195, para 12) "It is now trite that if a mistake is committed in passing an administrative order, the same may be rectified.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 62 - D Bhandari - Full Document

I.C.A.R. & Anr vs T.K. Suryanarayan & Ors on 5 August, 1997

18. Learned counsel for the respondents has also placed reliance upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in the case of I.C.A.R. & Anr. vs. T.K. Suryanarayan & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 5502 and 5504 of 1997 [arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 16873 with 18567 and 19103 of 1995) dated 05th August, 1997, reported in AIR 1997 SC 3108, the relevant para of the said judgment reads as under: -
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 23 - G N Ray - Full Document
1