Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.22 seconds)Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Smt. Kumari vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Others on 14 January, 1992
10. Petitioners are parents of three children, who were
aged around eight (8) years. It is not in dispute that the
three children were not aware of swimming and they
5
JAK, J
W.P.No.3861 of 2013
slipped and fell into Kinnerasani Project from the sluices
when they visited the Project. The issue was reported in
newspapers. As per the averments in the affidavit filed in
support of the writ petition, the Minister visited the spot
and spoke to the Irrigation Department officials and with
other respondent authorities. It is further averred that an
amount of Rs.2,00,000/- as ex-gratia for each of the
deceased family members and one job of luskur post is said
to have been promised. Learned counsel for petitioners
relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Kumari (SMT) vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others 1. The
relevant paragraphs are as follows:
Court On Its Own Motion vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others on 2 January, 2016
11. Learned counsel further relied on the judgment of the
Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in
Court on its Own Motion vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
and Others 2 and contended that after discussing the
entire case law, the Division Bench saddled the liability.
The relevant paragraphs are as follows:
1