Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.79 seconds)

M. Vanaja vs B. Balaseshanna And Ors. on 14 June, 2007

"...to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the 5th Respondent in issuing notification vide Ref. No. D/483/Karapa/0436024/2024 dated 01-01-2025 for appointment of permanent dealers in respect of Shop No.0436024 situated at China Mamidada village of Karapa Mandal of Kakinada District is contrary to the GO.Ms.No.4 dated 28- 02-2014 and GO.Ms.No.32 dated 03-12-2018 without issuing prior notice without following procedure and without following roster points contrary to GO.Ms.77 dated 02-08-2023 despite representations dated 10-10-2024 and 14-10-2024 as illegal, arbitrary. Capricious, colorable exercise of power, violative of principles of natural justice, contrary to the law laid down by Full Bench of this Hon'ble Court reported in M. Vanaja Vs. B. Balaseshanna and others, 2007 (4) ALD 388 (FB), apart from violation of Article 14, 16, 19 and 21 and 350 of Constitution of India and set aside the notification dated 01-01- 2025 forthwith in the interest of justice, consequently, continue the petitioner as dealer to the FPS No.0436024 by supplying commodities as usual forthwith in the interest of justice..."
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 22 - Cited by 14 - G S Singhvi - Full Document
1