Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 31 (0.33 seconds)Kerala Record of Rights Act, 1968
Section 4 in Kerala Record of Rights Act, 1968 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in Kerala Record of Rights Act, 1968 [Entire Act]
Kandasami Pillai vs Rangasami Nainar (Died) And Ors. on 26 July, 1912
46. While dealing with the question as to, whether the attestations of the
next presumptive reversioners are sufficient proof, under the circumstances,
of their consent to and ratification of the alienations of the respective
properties, the Madras High Court considered the ordinary course of conduct
of Indians, when they take attestation from a person having interest in the
property. The decision reported in Kandasami Pillai v. Rangasami
Nainar (1912) 23 M.L.J. 301, at p. 306 is relied upon, wherein, it is said that,
"having regard to the ordinary course of conduct of Indians in this Presidency,
attestation by a person who has or claims any interest in the property covered
by the document must be treated prima facie as a representation by him, that
the title and other facts relating to title, recited in the document, are true and
will not be disputed by him as against the obligee under the document."
Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling On Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973
Ratnamma W/O.B.K.Jayaramireddy,40 ... vs The Revenue Divisional Officer, ... on 24 July, 2015
58. The Ratnamma Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmavaram,
Annathapur District and others relied upon by the petitioners deals with
Officer within [thirty days] from the date of such acquisition, and the said Mandal Revenue
Officer shall give or send a written acknowledgement of the receipt of such intimation to the
person making it: