Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.25 seconds)Section 23 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Bombay Abkari Act, 1878
The Salt Cess Act, 1953
Section 8 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Velu Padayachi vs Sivasooriam Pillai on 16 December, 1949
After examining the provisions of Sections 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the Central Act I of 1944 and the provisions of the Madras Salt Act IV of 1889 which was repealed and the rules made under Section 37 of the former Act, and after also considering the argument that the possession of the receiver was tantamount to the transfer of the right of the licences, the Bench dealt with the question whether the principle laid down in the Full Bench case of Velu Padayachi v. Sivasooriam Pillai, , should be made applicable to that case, which would have the effect of declaring the sale void as being opposed to public policy.
The Central Excise Act, 1944
Nazaralli Sayad Imam vs Babamiya Dureyatimsha on 21 July, 1915
In Nazaralli Sayad Imam v. Babamiya Dureyatimsha, ILR 40 Bom 64 : (AIR 1915 Bom 244), a partner was taken by a forest contractor, and upon objection being taken to the agreement of partnership, it was held that although the terms of the agreement prohibited the taking of the partner, the fact that the forest officer could revoke the licence, the licencee's act in taking a partner could not be regarded at against the law or defeating the provisions of any law.