Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.28 seconds)

Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav & Anr on 18 January, 2005

16. The Apex Court has also referred to the principles laid down by it in Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan5, wherein it was held that the Court granting bail should exercise its discretion in a judicious manner and not as a matter of course. Though at the stage of granting bail, a detailed examination of evidence and elaborate documentation of the merit of the case need not be undertaken, there is a need to indicate in such orders reasons for prima facie concluding why bail was being granted particularly where the Accused is charged of having committed a serious offence. Any order devoid of such reasons would suffer from non-application of mind.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 2834 - Full Document

Rakesh Kumar Paul vs State Of Assam on 16 August, 2017

Thereby, the Sessions Judges or the Magistrates concerned in both the States and by virtue of this order and because of the settled 26 (2017) 15 SCC 67 36 position of law from the above particularly from the expressions in Tupakula Appa Rao supra, Niranjan Singh supra reiterated in Sundeep Kumar Bafna supra, entertain the regular bail applications from the accused in deemed custody even not produced on P.T. warrant and not surrendered voluntarily, as the case may be."
Supreme Court of India Cites 59 - Cited by 393 - M B Lokur - Full Document
1   2 Next