Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.55 seconds)The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
M/S. Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd vs Union Of India And Anr on 28 April, 2004
The said issue was considered by the Honourable Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2004) 6 SCC 254 (Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. v. Union of India). In paragraphs 21 and 22 the Supreme Court held thus,
"21. A parliamentary legislation when it receives the assent of the President of India and is published in the Official Gazette, unless specifically excluded, will apply to the entire territory of India. If passing of a legislation gives rise to a cause of action, a writ petition questioning the constitutionality thereof can be filed in any High Court of the country. It is not so done because a cause of action will arise only when the provisions of the Act or some of them which were implemented shall give rise to civil or evil consequences to the petitioner. A writ court, it is well settled, would not determine a constitutional question in a vacuum.
Section 17 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
L. Chandra Kumar vs Union Of India And Others on 18 March, 1997
(c) The learned single Judge/writ Court in this case has relied on several judgments of the Supreme Court in support of his decision viz. AIR 1973 SC 1461 (Kesavananda Bharathi v. State of Kerala); 1975 (Supp) SCC 1 (Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain; (1993) 4 SCC 441 (S.C.Advocates-on-record Association v. Union of India; 1981 (Supp) SCC 87 (S.P.Gupta v. Union of India); (1997) 3 SCC 261 (L.Chandra Kumar v. Union of India); (2004) 6 SCC 254 (Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. v. Union of India); (2007) 5 SCC 428 (Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Meena Variyal); (2009) 6 SCC 498 (Santhosh Kumar Sathishbhushan Bariyar v. State of Maharashtra); (2010) 3 SCC 571 (State of W.B. v. Committee for Production of Democratic Rights); CDJ 2010 SC 795 (Glanrock Estate (P) Ltd., v. The State of Tamil Nadu); etc.
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs Meena Variyal & Ors on 2 April, 2007
(c) The learned single Judge/writ Court in this case has relied on several judgments of the Supreme Court in support of his decision viz. AIR 1973 SC 1461 (Kesavananda Bharathi v. State of Kerala); 1975 (Supp) SCC 1 (Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain; (1993) 4 SCC 441 (S.C.Advocates-on-record Association v. Union of India; 1981 (Supp) SCC 87 (S.P.Gupta v. Union of India); (1997) 3 SCC 261 (L.Chandra Kumar v. Union of India); (2004) 6 SCC 254 (Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. v. Union of India); (2007) 5 SCC 428 (Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Meena Variyal); (2009) 6 SCC 498 (Santhosh Kumar Sathishbhushan Bariyar v. State of Maharashtra); (2010) 3 SCC 571 (State of W.B. v. Committee for Production of Democratic Rights); CDJ 2010 SC 795 (Glanrock Estate (P) Ltd., v. The State of Tamil Nadu); etc.
Santosh Kumar Satishbhushan Bariyar vs State Of Maharashtra on 13 May, 2009
(c) The learned single Judge/writ Court in this case has relied on several judgments of the Supreme Court in support of his decision viz. AIR 1973 SC 1461 (Kesavananda Bharathi v. State of Kerala); 1975 (Supp) SCC 1 (Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain; (1993) 4 SCC 441 (S.C.Advocates-on-record Association v. Union of India; 1981 (Supp) SCC 87 (S.P.Gupta v. Union of India); (1997) 3 SCC 261 (L.Chandra Kumar v. Union of India); (2004) 6 SCC 254 (Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. v. Union of India); (2007) 5 SCC 428 (Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Meena Variyal); (2009) 6 SCC 498 (Santhosh Kumar Sathishbhushan Bariyar v. State of Maharashtra); (2010) 3 SCC 571 (State of W.B. v. Committee for Production of Democratic Rights); CDJ 2010 SC 795 (Glanrock Estate (P) Ltd., v. The State of Tamil Nadu); etc.
State Of W.B. vs Managing Committee Of Sevagram ... on 8 September, 2014
(c) The learned single Judge/writ Court in this case has relied on several judgments of the Supreme Court in support of his decision viz. AIR 1973 SC 1461 (Kesavananda Bharathi v. State of Kerala); 1975 (Supp) SCC 1 (Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain; (1993) 4 SCC 441 (S.C.Advocates-on-record Association v. Union of India; 1981 (Supp) SCC 87 (S.P.Gupta v. Union of India); (1997) 3 SCC 261 (L.Chandra Kumar v. Union of India); (2004) 6 SCC 254 (Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. v. Union of India); (2007) 5 SCC 428 (Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Meena Variyal); (2009) 6 SCC 498 (Santhosh Kumar Sathishbhushan Bariyar v. State of Maharashtra); (2010) 3 SCC 571 (State of W.B. v. Committee for Production of Democratic Rights); CDJ 2010 SC 795 (Glanrock Estate (P) Ltd., v. The State of Tamil Nadu); etc.
Glanrock Estate (P) Ltd vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 9 September, 2010
(c) The learned single Judge/writ Court in this case has relied on several judgments of the Supreme Court in support of his decision viz. AIR 1973 SC 1461 (Kesavananda Bharathi v. State of Kerala); 1975 (Supp) SCC 1 (Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain; (1993) 4 SCC 441 (S.C.Advocates-on-record Association v. Union of India; 1981 (Supp) SCC 87 (S.P.Gupta v. Union of India); (1997) 3 SCC 261 (L.Chandra Kumar v. Union of India); (2004) 6 SCC 254 (Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. v. Union of India); (2007) 5 SCC 428 (Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Meena Variyal); (2009) 6 SCC 498 (Santhosh Kumar Sathishbhushan Bariyar v. State of Maharashtra); (2010) 3 SCC 571 (State of W.B. v. Committee for Production of Democratic Rights); CDJ 2010 SC 795 (Glanrock Estate (P) Ltd., v. The State of Tamil Nadu); etc.