Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.77 seconds)Section 3 in The Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Mozelle Robin Solomon vs Lt. Col. R.J. Solomon on 3 February, 1968
4. It is not and cannot be disputed that matrimonial disputes arising under the Jewish Law fall under Clause 12 and not Clause 35 of the Letters Patent, This position has been settled by a string of judicial pronouncements. If at all necessary, we may see Benjamin v, Benjamin , Mozelle Robin Solomon v. Lt. Col. R.J. Solomon (1968) 81 Bom.
Article 254 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Bombay University Act, 1974
Pinhas Ezekil Silas vs Sally Pinhas Silas on 15 April, 1983
L.R. 578, and Dr. Pinhas Ezekil Silas v. Sally Silas . Without covering the entire ground, I may only say that operation of Clause 35 of the Letters Patent is in terms restricted to "Our subjects professing the Christian religion". Obviously matrimonial matters under the Jewish Law will not fall under Clause 35.
1