Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.74 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 141 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Mannan Sk & Ors vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 3 July, 2014
11. He also cited a decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court
reported in Mannan SK Vs. State of West Bengal.
Girish Kumar Suneja vs Cbi on 13 July, 2017
21. By virtue of decision of Hon'ble Apex Court passed in
Sethuraman (Supra) and Girish Kumar Suneja (supra). The
instant revisional application is not at all maintainable.
State Of Nct Delhi vs Shiv Kumar Yadav on 20 March, 2015
In support of his contention he cited decisions of
Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in State (NCT of Delhi) Vs.
Shib Kumar Yadav and Anr.
Raminder Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 19 September, 2016
27. At this stage, to judge as to
whether certain questions should have been
put to the witnesses in cross-examination or
should not have been put to them, would in my
view result in prejudging as to what are the
material portions of the evidence and would
also amount to reappraising the entire cross-
examination conducted by the earlier counsel
to conclude whether he had done a competent
job or not. This certainly is not within the
scope and power of the court under Section
311 Cr.P.C. I am supported in my view by the
observations of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in
its order dated 20.02.2008 in Raminder Sing v.
State. Where it has been held as under:
Nani Gopal Majumder vs State Of West Bengal & Ors on 23 September, 2011
29. Having regard to the principles laid
down in the above cited decisions and
judging the factual matrix of the case as
discussed above when the petitioner has
been examined and cross-examined at
length and for the reason that no
sufficient explanation for delay in filing
application was given for the recall of
PW 1 and no question enumerated in the
petition under Section 311 of the Code, I
am of the opinion and accordingly hold
that the learned Trial Judge was right in
rejecting the application bearing in mind
the settled principle of law on that
13
count. However, since the Court is
empowered to recall a witness under
Section 311 Cr.P.C. at any stage of the
trial, the learned Trial judge may allow
the prosecution after the rest of the CS
witnesses are examined and cross-
examined in full, if for the ends of
justice, such recourse is imperative by
giving full opportunities to the
prosecution and to the defence.