Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.47 seconds)Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sangeeta Devi & Ors on 22 February, 2016
(iii) In MACP No.6031/2016 (Old No.15/2016); I award compensation of
Rs.22,78,000/- (including Interim Award, if any) alongwith interest @ 9% per
annum in favour of injured/petitioner Devender Kumar and against the
respondents w.e.f the date of filing of the petition, i.e. 07.01.2016 till the date of its
realization (Reliance placed on judgment "Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.
Sangeeta Devi & Ors bearing MAC. APP. 165/2011 decided on 22.02.2016).
Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Vinod Kumar @ Bittoo vs Roshni & Ors. on 5 July, 2012
57. Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter titled as " Vinod Kumar Bitoo Vs.
Roshni & Ors." passed in appeal bearing no. MAC.APP 518/2010 decided on
05.07.12, has held as under:-
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Arjun & Ors. on 4 January, 2018
In support of
his aforesaid contention, learned counsel has relied upon judgments titled as,
"Arjun & Ors. Vs. IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd." MAC Appeal No.
223/16, decided on 04.01.2018; "Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. V/s Malti
Devi & Ors.", in MAC. APP.
Shamim Akhtar vs Dinesh Chand & Anr (Bajaj Allianz ... on 26 September, 2018
572/2012, decided on 20.05.2015; "Bajaj Allianz
General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shamim Akhtar & Anr." in MAC. APP.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. ... vs Nasruddin And Ors. on 28 May, 2015
616/2018
& C.Ms. 26742/2018, decided on 26.09.2018; and "Bajaj Allianz General
Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nasruddin & Ors.", in MAC. APP. 585/2012, decided on
28.05.2015, passed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. In the aforementioned
judgments, Hon' ble High Court has taken the same percentage of permanent
disability as functional disability of the petitioner in relation to whole body.
Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009
20. As per the service book, the date of birth of the
titled as, "United India
deceased HC Shri Bhagwan is 30.01.1970. He
Insurance Company suffered injuries on 01.11.2010 and succumbed to
those injuries on 08.11.2010. Thus, at the time of his
Limited V/s Smt.Neelam&
death, he had not completed 41 years. The deceased
Ors.", HC Shri Bhagwan has left behind six dependents
and as per Sarla Verma's case (Supra), deduction
(paragraph No.20)
for personal and living expenses could be 1/4th ,
which has been done by the Tribunal and the
multiplier to be applied, if the age of the deceased is
between 36 to 40 years is '15'. If the age of the
deceased is between 41 to 45 years, the multiplier
applicable will be '14'. Here in this case, the
deceased had not attained the age of 41 years at
the time of his death, hence the learned Tribunal
has rightly applied the multiplier of '15'.
National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi And Others on 22 June, 2022
In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case and in view
of decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of "National Insurance Company
Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors." mentioned supra, a sum of Rs.15,000/-+Rs.1,500/-
(enhancement @ 10% of Rs.15,000/-)=Rs.16,500/- each is awarded in favour of
petitioners on account of loss of estate and funeral expenses.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ... vs Pooja & Ors. on 2 November, 2017
Further, Hon'ble Delhi High Court in appeal titled as "Bajaj Allianz General
Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pooja & Ors", mentioned supra has been pleased to
observe in para 18 of the judgment that the Constitution Bench decision in Pranay
Sethi (supra) does not recognize any other non-pecuniary head of damages. Hence,
no amount of compensation is being awarded under this head.