Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.25 seconds)
Sachin Jaiswal vs University Grants Commission & Anr on 5 September, 2023 cites

Salil Maheshwari vs High Court Of Delhi on 11 July, 2014

11. If the decision passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this court in the case of Salil Maheshwari (supra) is carefully perused, the same would indicate that if the candidate who had the opportunity to raise an objection and if the objection is not raised, is not entitled for challenging the final answer key at the subsequent stage. Paragraph no.7 of the said case reads as under:-
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 11 - Full Document

Dhananjay Malik & Ors vs State Of Uttaranchal & Ors on 5 March, 2008

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/09/2023 at 16:50:39 -4- variance with the answer key. Here, the last date for communicating objections was 23.6.2014, and the respondent released its response to the objections on 2.7.2014. The results were only published on 8.7.2014. It appears that the petitioner did not think it necessary to object to this question before the deadline for objections, but only sought to object after the results were published on 8.7.2014 by way of this petition filed on 1.8.2014. This Court finds that the petitioner was therefore estopped from raising a challenge at this belated stage, since a challenge cannot be advanced against a selection process only after the candidate has discovered his or her unsuccessful performance in the process. See Dhananjay Malik v. State of Uttaranchal (2008) 4 SCC 171 and Madan Lal v. State of J&K (1995) 3 SCC 486. Consequently, no findings will be recorded in regard to this question."
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 526 - H K Sema - Full Document
1