cites: 1977243

1 - 7 of 7 (0.30 seconds)

Bhavarlal Sukhalal Soni, Since ... vs Lakshminarayan Deo Public Trust ... on 9 February, 1994 cites

Madhukar Vishnu Sathe And Others vs Vithoba Ramji Thorat, (Since Deceased ... on 21 March, 1991

9. Under the circumstances, in our view, Madhukar Sathe (AIR 1992 Bom 772) (supra) does not lay down law correctly and Dattatraya Pandit (1991 Bom RC 60) and Gajanand ((1982) Bom CR 259) (supra) have correctly laid down the law. Reference answered accordingly.

Bombay High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Kartar Singh vs Chaman Lal & Others on 14 March, 1969

In the case of S. Kartar Singh v. Chaman Lal, , Section 14(1)(h) has been interpreted on the lines indicated above.

Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 25 - A N Grover - Full Document

Dr. Gopal Dass Verma vs Dr. S. K. Bhardwaj And Another on 2 May, 1961

In the said decision, following observations in the case of Dr. Gogal Dass Varma v. Dr. S.K. Bhardwaj have received approval (page 340) :

Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 55 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document

Section 13 in The Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 [Entire Act]

Bombay Presidency - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 177

The Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888

State of Maharashtra - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 2272

Section 14 in The Delhi Rent Act, 1995 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 3942

Anirudhha Ramkrishna Karlekar vs Jankibai Raghunath Bedekar on 15 November, 1989

But the learned single Judge has based his view on the interpretation given to the word "residence" in Clause 13(1)(c) of the Act by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Anirudhha Ramkrishna Karlekar v. Smt. Jankibai Raghunath Bodekar, 1990 Mah LJ 299 which has been confirmed by the Supreme Court .

Bombay High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results