Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.60 seconds)Section 35 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 54 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 27A in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Gunwantlal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 3 May, 1972
24. As noted in Gunwantlal v. State of M.P. [(1972) 2 SCC 194 : 1972 SCC
(Cri) 678 : AIR 1972 SC 1756] possession in a given case need not be
physical possession but can be constructive, having power and control over
the article in the case in question, while the person to whom physical
possession is given holds it subject to that power or control.
Section 114 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Naresh Kumar @ Nitu vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 27 July, 2017
8. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Naresh Kumar v. State of H.P1
held the following:-
Madan Lal And Anr vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 19 August, 2003
9. The following was observed by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of Madan
Lal v. State of H.P.2:-