Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.21 seconds)
State vs . Ashok Kumar - Sc No. 212 Of 2010 1/11 on 31 March, 2012 cites

Amalendu Pal @ Jhantu vs State Of West Bengal on 11 November, 2009

In a case reported as 'Amalendu Pal @ Jhantu vs. State of West Bengal', AIR 2010 SC 512, Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that the legal position State Vs. Ashok Kumar - SC No. 212 of 2010 9/11 ID No.02403R0140072009 as regards Sections 306 IPC which is long settled was recently reiterated in the case of 'Randhir Singh v. State of Punjab' (2004) 13 SCC 129 as follows, "Abetment involves a mental process of instigating a person or intentionally aiding that person in doing of a thing. In cases of conspiracy also it would involve that mental process of entering into conspiracy for the doing of that thing. More active role which can be described as instigating or aiding the doing of a thing is required before a person can be said to be abetting the commission of offence under section 306 IPC."
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 556 - M Sharma - Full Document

Randhir Singh And Anr vs State Of Punjab on 12 October, 2004

In a case reported as 'Amalendu Pal @ Jhantu vs. State of West Bengal', AIR 2010 SC 512, Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that the legal position State Vs. Ashok Kumar - SC No. 212 of 2010 9/11 ID No.02403R0140072009 as regards Sections 306 IPC which is long settled was recently reiterated in the case of 'Randhir Singh v. State of Punjab' (2004) 13 SCC 129 as follows, "Abetment involves a mental process of instigating a person or intentionally aiding that person in doing of a thing. In cases of conspiracy also it would involve that mental process of entering into conspiracy for the doing of that thing. More active role which can be described as instigating or aiding the doing of a thing is required before a person can be said to be abetting the commission of offence under section 306 IPC."
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 295 - Full Document
1   2 Next