Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.19 seconds)
Chundi Raghava Rajesh And Others vs State Of Telangana,Rep. By Its Public ... on 6 March, 2015
cites
Krishna Gopal Divedi vs Prabha Divedi on 23 February, 2001
4) Denying the charges in the FIR, learned counsel for petitioners would
submit that the complainant had suppressed the material facts and gave a
false report to implicate the accused. He would submit that in fact A1
obtained divorce against the defacto complainant in FCOP No.1135 of 2010
on 06.11.2010 from Family Court, Hyderabad and lawfully married second
time and accused 2 to 5 have nothing to do with the said marriage and the
defacto complainant has full knowledge about passing of divorce decree and
the said decree is still in force as the complainant has not filed any appeal
and
obtained stay of said decree and in view of these facts, the present complaint
for the offence under Section 494 IPC is not maintainable and its
continuation will amount to abuse of process of law. On this aspect he relied
upon the decision of the Apex Court reported in Krishna Gopal Divedi vs.
Prabha Divedi .
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 418 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1