Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.34 seconds)Minerva Mills Ltd. And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 9 May, 1980
In, Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India, 1980 (3) SCC 625 : (AIR 1980 SC 1789) a five-Judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court held as follows:
L. Chandra Kumar vs Union Of India And Others on 18 March, 1997
". . . . Our Constitution is founded on a nice balance of power among the three wings of the State, namely, the Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary. It is the function of the Judges, nay their duty, to pronounce upon the validity of laws. If Courts are totally deprived of that power, the fundamental rights conferred upon the people will become a mere adornment because rights without remedies are as writ in water. A controlled Constitution will then become uncontrolled." (Para 21)
In, L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 1125 : (1997 Lab IC 1069), the Supreme Court held as follows:
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 3 in Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 [Entire Act]
Section 3A in Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 [Entire Act]
Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs The Chiief Election Commissioner, New ... on 2 December, 1977
In, Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner, AIR 1978 SC 851, the Supreme Court held that when a statutory authority passes an order based on certain ground, it cannot be supplemented by new grounds by affidavits. Therefore, the plea cannot be relied as a ground for rejecting petitioner's application. Apart from the above same section exempting workshops and factories which may earn profits. Even unaided but recognised schools also collect fees. Collec-
Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975
1