Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.26 seconds)Section 21 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Bombay University Act, 1974
Shankar Ramchandra Abhyankar vs Krishnaji Dattatreya Bapat on 16 April, 1969
11. Sri Ashok Haranahalli also placed reliance on a Decision of the Supreme Court in SHANKAR RAMACHANDRA ABHYANKAR v. KRISHNAGIRI DATTATREYA BAPAT, in which the Supreme Court has observed as under:
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Shyamaraju Hegde vs U. Venkatesha Bhat & Ors on 25 September, 1987
6. It is only by virtue of the Full Bench Decision of this Court in KRISHNAJI VENKATESH SHIRODKAR v. GURUPAD SHIVRAM KAVALEKAR AND ORS., ILR (Karnataka) 1978 (2) 1585 which is affirmed by the Supreme Court in the case of SHYAMARAJU HEGDE v. VENKATESHA BHAT, ILR 1987 KAR 3244 by setting aside the Full Bench Decision of this Court in M.M. YARAGATTI v. VASANT, that Second Revision Petitions filed under Section 115 CPC against the first revisional order of the District Judge are entertained. Therefore, the first argument of Sri Chandrasekharaiah that Section 29(1) of the Act is not applicable to the Revision Petitions filed under Section 115 CPC for the reason that Section 115 CPC is not mentioned in Section 29(1) of the Act, cannot be regarded as a sound argument.