Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.27 seconds)Article 15 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Premila Devi vs The Peoples Bank Of Northern India, ... on 17 October, 1938
In my opinion, his letter cannot be taken to be a waiver of his right to object to the forfeiture of his shares. What he asked the company to do was to allow the shares to be transferred to Mr. Gopee Ballav Sen, who was willing to pay the whole of the sum outstanding upon the shares, namely, Rs. 13,500. Further, he could not waive his rights. I have already referred to Lord Romer's judgment in Premila Devi v. The Peoples Bank of Northern India, Ltd. where he states that others than the share-holders are interested in a forfeiture of shares, e.g., the creditors. He goes on to say as follows:
Article 106 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 17 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 44 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 108 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 23 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Pioneer Alkali Works Limited vs Amiruddin Shalebhoy Tyebji on 24 November, 1925
15. These are the whole of the English cases which can be discovered on this point. There are three cases in the Bombay High Court the first being Pioneer Alkali Works, Ltd. v. Amiruddin Shabbhoy Tyebji and the second being Bhagirathi Spinning, Weaving and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. Balaji Bhowani Powar ('30) 17 A.I.R. 1930 Bom.
The Bhagirath Spinning And Weaving And ... vs Balaji Bhavani Powar on 14 October, 1929
15. These are the whole of the English cases which can be discovered on this point. There are three cases in the Bombay High Court the first being Pioneer Alkali Works, Ltd. v. Amiruddin Shabbhoy Tyebji and the second being Bhagirathi Spinning, Weaving and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. Balaji Bhowani Powar ('30) 17 A.I.R. 1930 Bom.