Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.25 seconds)Bhinka And Others vs Charan Singh on 24 April, 1959
6. The judgment of this Court in Sadhu Ram v. Charan Singh, (1963) 65 Pun LR 526, however, provides a complete answer here The plea that the finding of possession recorded by the court in proceedings under S. 145 of the Code was not open to challenge before the Civil Court, was expressly negatived In holding so, due note was taken of the provisions of sub-sec (6) of S. 145 of the Code, as also the observations of Subba Rao J. in Bhinka's case supra As regards the judgment of the High Court of Lahore in Sewa Das's case, ( AIR 1947 Lah 173)(supra), it was held that it had not been correctly (decided.
Jathedar Sadhu Singh And Ors. vs Charan Singh And Ors. on 23 August, 1971
6. The judgment of this Court in Sadhu Ram v. Charan Singh, (1963) 65 Pun LR 526, however, provides a complete answer here The plea that the finding of possession recorded by the court in proceedings under S. 145 of the Code was not open to challenge before the Civil Court, was expressly negatived In holding so, due note was taken of the provisions of sub-sec (6) of S. 145 of the Code, as also the observations of Subba Rao J. in Bhinka's case supra As regards the judgment of the High Court of Lahore in Sewa Das's case, ( AIR 1947 Lah 173)(supra), it was held that it had not been correctly (decided.
Nata Padhan And Ors. vs Banchha Baral And Ors. on 10 April, 1967
7. A similar view was expressed by the High Court of Orissa in Nata Pardhan v. Banchha Baral, AIR 1968 Orissa 36: (1968 Cri LJ 336).
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
1