Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.27 seconds)Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Etc vs State Of Punjab on 9 April, 1980
"111. No inflexible guidelines or straitjacket
formula can be provided for grant or refusal of
anticipatory bail. We are clearly of the view that
no attempt should be made to provide rigid and
inflexible guidelines in this respect because all
circumstances and situations of future cannot be
clearly visualized for the grant or refusal of
anticipatory bail. In consonance with the
legislative intention the grant or refusal of
anticipatory bail should necessarily depend on
facts and circumstances of each case. As aptly
obs erved in the Constitution Bench decision in
Sibbia's case (supra) that the High Court or the
Court of Sessions to exercise their jurisdiction
under section 438 Cr.P.C. by a wise and careful
::: Downloaded on - 06/10/2018 22:57:39 :::HCHP
4
use of their discretion which by their long
training and experience they are ideally suited
to do. In any event, this is the legislative
mandate which we are bound to respect and
.
Sanjay Chandra vs Cbi on 23 November, 2011
7. The view stands reiterated by the apex Court in
Sanjay Chandra versus Central Bureau of Investigation,
(2012) 1 SCC 40.
Prasanta Kumar Sarkar vs Ashis Chatterjee & Anr on 29 October, 2010
8. Apex Court in Prasanta Kumar Sarkar versus
Ashis Chatterjee and another, (2010) 14 SCC 496, has laid
down the following principles to be kept in mind, while
deciding petition for bail:
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 2 December, 2010
6. Law with regard to grant of bail is now well
settled. The Apex Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre
versus State of Maharashtra and others, (2011) 1 SCC 694,
while relying upon its decision rendered by its Constitution
Bench in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia vs. State of Punjab, (1980)
2 SCC 565, laid down the following parameters for grant of
bail:-