Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.23 seconds)

Andhra Pradesh Public Service ... vs Gunja Mahendra Kumar on 6 December, 2016

In view of settled legal position, which has been propounded by the learned Single Judge in the case of Pawan Kumar Bardiya (supra) and various Division Bench of this Court in the cases of Prem Ratan Modi (supra), Gopal Lal Sharma (supra), Rajasthan Public Service Commission vs. Mahendra Kumar (supra), Manish Sharma (supra) and Hem Raj Gurhani (supra), this Court has no hesitation to hold that this Court cannot pronounce overage candidates as eligible. Hence, this Court cannot come to rescue of the petitioners.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 139 - Full Document

Abhishek Sharma And Ors vs Raj Board Of Seconday And Ors on 19 March, 2010

In the case of Abhishek Sharma & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & anr., DB Special Appeal (Writ) No. 731/2007, decided on 22.5.2007, this court issued similar directions to the Government for consideration of representation keeping in mind hardship of the appellant therein. That was also for grant of age relaxation under rule 46 applicable thereunder.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 0 - Cited by 13 - A Rastogi - Full Document

Gopal Lal Sharma And Ors vs State (Panchayat Raj Dep)Ors on 14 October, 2011

In view of settled legal position, which has been propounded by the learned Single Judge in the case of Pawan Kumar Bardiya (supra) and various Division Bench of this Court in the cases of Prem Ratan Modi (supra), Gopal Lal Sharma (supra), Rajasthan Public Service Commission vs. Mahendra Kumar (supra), Manish Sharma (supra) and Hem Raj Gurhani (supra), this Court has no hesitation to hold that this Court cannot pronounce overage candidates as eligible. Hence, this Court cannot come to rescue of the petitioners.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 12 - A Rastogi - Full Document

Manish Sharma vs High Court Of Judi. For Raj., Jodhpur on 21 June, 2013

In view of settled legal position, which has been propounded by the learned Single Judge in the case of Pawan Kumar Bardiya (supra) and various Division Bench of this Court in the cases of Prem Ratan Modi (supra), Gopal Lal Sharma (supra), Rajasthan Public Service Commission vs. Mahendra Kumar (supra), Manish Sharma (supra) and Hem Raj Gurhani (supra), this Court has no hesitation to hold that this Court cannot pronounce overage candidates as eligible. Hence, this Court cannot come to rescue of the petitioners.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 4 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

Hem Raj Malav And Ors vs State Of Raj & Ors on 10 January, 2011

In view of settled legal position, which has been propounded by the learned Single Judge in the case of Pawan Kumar Bardiya (supra) and various Division Bench of this Court in the cases of Prem Ratan Modi (supra), Gopal Lal Sharma (supra), Rajasthan Public Service Commission vs. Mahendra Kumar (supra), Manish Sharma (supra) and Hem Raj Gurhani (supra), this Court has no hesitation to hold that this Court cannot pronounce overage candidates as eligible. Hence, this Court cannot come to rescue of the petitioners.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 4 - Cited by 12 - A Rastogi - Full Document

Pawan Kumar Bardiya And Ors vs State Of Raj And Anr on 18 August, 2011

Similar liberty was also granted by the learned Single Judge in the case of Pawan Kumar Bardiya (supra). Therefore, in the interest of justice, each petitioner is granted liberty to make representation to the State Government on the anvil of rule 38 of Rules of 1971 and other co-related rules applicable to the case of relaxation with regard to the age. It is ordered that in case the representation is filed by each petitioner in individual capacity within two weeks from today, then the State Government shall take decision upon the representation so filed within a period of four weeks, independently without persuaded by any observation made by this Court.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 11 - Cited by 140 - M N Bhandari - Full Document
1   2 Next