Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.24 seconds)Section 34 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Section 29 in The Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
The Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959
Section 34 in The Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Section 176 in The Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Rajendra Karbhari Kale vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 23 January, 2017
12. As a second limb of the submission, Mr. Patil would urge
that, in the meeting of panchayat held on 18 th March, 2024, the
Respondent No. 1 had categorically disputed the resignation
and disowned the same. In this view of the matter, the
Divisional Commissioner was justified in returning a finding
that, there was no lawful resignation and, in any event, the
same stood withdrawn. To lend support to this submission, the
learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 placed reliance on the
decisions of this Court in the cases of Mina Kalyan Devdhe Vs.
SAINATH 10/29
::: Uploaded on - 23/01/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 23/01/2026 23:12:54 :::
WP 12689-2025.DOC
Commissioner, Nashik Division & Ors.1, Sudhakar Yashwant
Warule Vs. Gramsevak & Ors.2, and Kalavati Rajendra Kokale
Vs. State of Maharashtra3.
Babanrao Uttamrao Jadhav vs The Additional Collector, Beed And ... on 5 August, 2016
27. Following the aforesaid pronouncement in the case of
Babanrao Uttamrao Jadhav Vs. Additional Collector & Ors. 5,
another Division Bench observed as under:-
Kumudini Ratilal Bhagat (Sou.) And Ors. vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 12 March, 1987
The same view was
taken by the another Division Bench in a case of
Kumudini Ratilal Bhagat V. State of Maharashtra
referred to supra.
1