Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 55 (0.31 seconds)

Surendra Paswan vs State Of Jharkhand on 28 November, 2003

"56. The same view was expressed by this Court in Surendra Paswan v. State of Jharkhand. In that case the investigating officer had not sent the blood samples collected from the spot for chemical examination. This Court held that merely because the sample was not so sent may constitute a deficiency in the investigation but the same did not corrode the evidentiary value of the eyewitnesses."
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 49 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Guru Dutt Pathak vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Home ... on 6 May, 2021

124. Furthermore, it needs to refer herein that examination of independent witnesses is not an indispensable requisite if the testimonies of other witnesses are deemed trustworthy and reliable. Reference in this regard be made to the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Guru Dutt Pathak vs. State of U.P (supra), ratio of the said case has already been discussed and mentioned in the preceding paragraphs.
Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 92 - M R Shah - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next