Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.25 seconds)
Chhotu vs State Of U.P. on 9 December, 2020 cites

Rakesh Kumar Paul vs State Of Assam on 16 August, 2017

Imposing such condition while releasing the accused on default bail/statutory bail would frustrate the very object and purpose of default bail under Section 167(2), Cr.P.C. As observed by this Court in the case of Rakesh Kumar Paul (supra) and in other decisions, the accused is entitled to default bail/statutory bail, subject to the eventuality occurring in Section 167, Cr.P.C., namely, investigation is not completed within 60 days or 90 days, as the case may be, and no chargesheet is filed by 60th or 90th day and the accused applies for default bail and is prepared to furnish bail."
Supreme Court of India Cites 59 - Cited by 393 - M B Lokur - Full Document

U.O.I. Thr. Cbi vs Nirala Yadav@Raja Ram Yadav@Deepak ... on 30 June, 2014

We are concerned with Conclusion (3) which reads as follows: (Nirala Yadav case [Union of India v. Nirala Yadav, (2014) 9 SCC 457 : (2014) 5 SCC (Cri) 212] , SCC p. 472, para 24) "''13. (3) On the expiry of the said period of 90 days or 60 days, as the case may be, an indefeasible right accrues in favour of the accused for being released on bail on account of default by the investigating agency in the completion of the investigation within the period prescribed and the accused is entitled to be released on bail, if he is prepared to and furnishes the bail as directed by the Magistrate.'
Supreme Court of India Cites 47 - Cited by 159 - D Misra - Full Document
1   2 3 Next