Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.27 seconds)
Sukh Singh Through Lrs vs Ummed Singh Through Lrs on 1 February, 2019 cites

Satyadhyan Ghosal And Others vs Sm. Deorajin Debi And Another on 20 April, 1960

The Court referred to the decision in Satyadhyan Ghosal (supra) and quoted a passage from the said decision and thereafter took note of two submissions advanced by the learned Counsel for the Respondents therein which were to the effect that (1) an issue of fact or law decided even in an interlocutory proceeding could operate as res judicata in a later proceeding, and (2) in order to attract the principle of res judicata the order or decision first rendered and which is pleaded as res judicata need not be capable of being appealed against. Dealing with the same the Court observed thus:
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 469 - K C Gupta - Full Document

Y.B. Patil And Ors vs Y.L. Patil on 23 August, 1976

In the case of Y. B. Patil (supra), the findings of the Assistant Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner regarding the question (Downloaded on 05/06/2021 at 11:50:31 PM) (7 of 10) [CW-10279/2018] of appellant being strangers qua the land in dispute took a very restricted view of Section 79 of the Act dealing with the revision wherein the revision petition was dismissed for the High Court has declined to interfere in the order made in revision. In that factual matrix, the Apex Court of the land on a survey of the contextual factual matrix made those observations. Whereas the factual matrix of the case at hand is entirely different and distinguishable.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 120 - H R Khanna - Full Document
1   2 Next