Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.23 seconds)

Rahul Khilnani & Anr vs Atul Kumar Jain & Ors on 23 September, 2022

15. Whereas observation made in the case of Rahul Khilnani (Supra), relied upon by the Respondent No. 1, that since the Operational Creditors have no right to vote in the meeting of the CoC, therefore, they have not suffered any prejudice, does not apply because in such a situation the provision of notice to the Operational Creditors or their representatives in Section 24(3)(c) would be otiose and the said provision itself would become redundant.
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1