Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.21 seconds)Smt. Saraswati And Ors. vs Shri Shiv Shankar And Ors. on 3 July, 2007
The
Ld. Counsel for the respondent in support of his argument has
further relied upon the judgement reported as Smt. Saraswati &
others Vs. Shiv Shankar & others 2007 (3) JCC 2245 and Shiv
Narain & others, applicants Vs. State of UP & another, opposite
parties 2000 Crl. L. J. 3346.
Rajdeo Sharma vs State Of Bihar on 14 May, 1999
The Ld. Counsel for the respondent
has argued that the judgement relied upon by the revisionist at the
time of arguments on charge i.e. Rajdeo Sharma Vs. State of
Bihar 1998 AIR (SC) 3281 pertains to the FIR matter, whereas the
present case is the complaint case.
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 342 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 319 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Banshi Dhar vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr on 31 October, 2006
In Banshi Dhar & Anr. Vs. State of
Rajasthan 2001 (2) Crimes 263 it was held that at the stage of
framing of charge, trial court is not required to marshal material on
record but only has to prima facie consider prima facie case.